Corporate Litigation: SLUSA’s ‘In Connection With’ Requirement
In his column for the New York Law Journal, Litigation Partner Joe McLaughlin examines the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., which reversed a SLUSA dismissal of state law fiduciary claims, illustrating that, particularly in fee-related cases, the line between federal securities law claims and state law claims remains inexact.
To read the full article, please click here.